![]() ![]() After successful completion of Graphic Design Survey, students may apply to the graphic design major via portfolio review. Note that enrollment in ARGD 2010 may be limited due to area instructional resources. Multiple sections of ARGD 2010 will be offered each academic year in the spring term. Students interested in pursuing the Graphic Design concentration should enroll in ARGD 2010, Graphic Design Survey, in the spring of the first year of study in art and design.ĪRGD 2010 prerequisites: completion of ARST 1050, Drawing I OR ARST 1060, Color & Composition. Graphic Design is a high-demand major and admission is competitive. Alumni have held positions at the following firms and companies: CNN & Turner Broadcasting Graduates of the program secure positions in a variety of creative positions in firms ranging from boutique design studios that focus on motion, experience, or branding design to the entertainment and publishing industries to in-house creative departments for museums, apparel brands, and digital companies. Find more information about BFA course requirements at the Lamar Dodd School of Art here. To major in graphic design, students must go through a portfolio review process to be accepted into the major after completing initial coursework in studio core and introductory graphic design courses. The Graphic Design program is competitive and is only offered at the undergraduate level. The program supports an interdisciplinary approach to design and benefits from the wider offerings within the School of Art and the greater University. More broadly, today’s decision weakens long-standing laws that protect all Americans against discrimination in public accommodations - including people of color, people with disabilities, people of faith, and women.The Graphic Design program aims to prepare students for creative lives and professions related to visual communication design through broad coursework that develops abilities in design fundamentals, collaboration, builds an understanding of audiences, and encourages experimentation across media. In a statement following the ruling, President Biden said he was “deeply concerned that the decision could invite more discrimination against LGBTQI+ Americans. It follows a similarly ideological decision last year by the court’s 6-3 conservative majority that sided with a football coach who wanted to pray on the field after games. ![]() The ruling is a step back for LGBTQ rights in the country. Grant allowed that it’s possible Stewart did, in fact, file the request and was lying to her, but ADF and Smith did not respond to her questions attempting to establish whether Stewart and Mike were a real couple. District Judge Marcia Krieger dismissed parts of Smith’s case, writing, “Assuming that it indicates a market for Plaintiffs’ services, it is not clear that Stewart and Mike are a same-sex couple (as such names can be used by members of both sexes) and it does not explicitly request website services, without which there can be no refusal by Plaintiffs.”ĪDF criticized Krieger’s ruling in a statement, lamenting that “a federal judge ruled that Smith and her studio can’t sue to challenge a portion of Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act because a request sent to Smith by a couple, self-identified as ‘Stewart’ and ‘Mike,’ isn’t formal enough to prove that a same-sex couple has asked her to help them celebrate their wedding.” (Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images) Smith speaks outside the Supreme Court on Dec. However, according to a Thursday story in the New Republic, the only inquiry Smith has ever received about potentially creating a wedding website for a gay couple apparently came from a man who says he never sent it. In a major win for the religious right, the court’s conservative justices all agreed. Smith, a Christian who does not make wedding websites but said she would like to, said the Colorado law violated her First Amendment rights. On Friday morning, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 along ideological lines that Lorie Smith, a Colorado graphic designer who wanted to create wedding websites, could choose not to make them for same-sex couples despite a state law that protected against discrimination based on sexual orientation, race, gender and other characteristics. The same-sex couple whose request for a wedding website was cited in a major case resulting in a Supreme Court decision that undercut LGBTQ rights may not actually exist. Protesters in front of the Supreme Court on Dec. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |